Data scrapers infringe copyright or trademark rights, data protection legislation, and/or contravene the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

Content creation and online presence are integral to businesses and individuals alike, and the threat of copyright infringement has become a growing concern. Copyright trolls, entities that exploit copyright claims for financial gain, often target unsuspecting website owners and creators. AI Digital Trust Services, offered by, have emerged as a powerful solution to combat copyright trolls and protect your digital assets.

Copyright trolls are entities that aggressively pursue legal action against individuals or businesses, claiming copyright infringement and demanding settlements to avoid lawsuits. They exploit the complex nature of copyright law and often target website owners who may unknowingly use copyrighted material. This has led to a rise in legal threats and demands for compensation, causing significant stress and financial burdens for those caught in the crosshairs.

AI Digital Trust is at the forefront of providing comprehensive digital trust services, leveraging advanced artificial intelligence algorithms to scan and analyze online content for potential copyright violations. These services are designed to empower website owners and creators, offering proactive measures to identify and address copyright concerns before they escalate into legal issues.

  1. Content Scanning: AI Digital Trust employs cutting-edge technology to scan websites for copyrighted material. The system analyzes images, text, and multimedia content to identify potential copyright infringements. (We will never scan, scrape, or crawl your website without your permission unless you pay us to do so for your safeguarding protection). We do not work underhandedly unlike some entities we could name. We do not entrap businesses.
  2. Copyright Compliance Assessment: The service assesses your website’s content against established copyright laws, helping you understand and rectify any potential violations. This proactive approach ensures legal compliance and reduces the risk of copyright troll targeting.
  3. Customized Reports: Users receive detailed reports outlining the findings of the content scan. This transparency allows website owners to take informed actions to address copyright concerns.
  4. Nominal Fee for Site Scanning: AI Digital Trust offers a cost-effective solution for website owners to scan their sites for potential copyright issues. This nominal fee provides access to a powerful tool that can prevent legal hassles and safeguard your online presence.
  5. Educational Resources: In addition to the scanning services, AI Digital Trust provides educational resources to help users better understand copyright laws and best practices for content usage. This knowledge empowers website owners to make informed decisions and mitigate the risk of unintentional infringements.


AI Digital Trust is a beacon of protection for website owners and content creators. By offering advanced content scanning services and educational resources, it not only fights against copyright trolls but also empowers individuals and businesses to navigate the digital realm with confidence.

Don’t wait for legal troubles to knock on your digital door – take the proactive step of employing AI Digital Trust Services to secure your online presence today.

With AI evolving faster than the speed of light more businesses are going to be caught out. If you do not have anything on your website to protect you from troll bots crawling sites purposely for illicit gains you need to start protecting yourself.

It is better to offer a solution rather than penalize the business or individual, dwelling solely on the problem. A proactive problem-solving approach not only fosters progress but also empowers individuals and organizations to navigate challenges effectively and builds trust between you and the end user.

Trolling and scraping sites to make money will not gain you credibility but will end up giving you a bad reputation. By offering a solution and getting the website owner’s permission to scan their site, instead of demand notices you will create residual income as the website owner will prefer to pay for a service one hundred times over to protect themselves rather than be penalized once for any wrongdoings.

Copying images directly from search engine results is not only ethically questionable but can also lead to legal consequences. Search engines index and display images that are often protected by copyright laws, meaning that the original creators or owners have exclusive rights to their use and distribution. Copying and using these images without permission may constitute copyright infringement, exposing individuals or businesses to potential legal actions. Additionally, it undermines the principles of fair use and intellectual property rights. To avoid legal complications, it is advisable to source images from reputable stock photo websites, use images with proper licensing, or seek permission from the copyright owner before using any visuals found through search engine results. Respecting intellectual property rights not only promotes a fair online environment but also supports the creativity and livelihood of content creators.

  1. Early Detection: By scanning websites regularly, AI Digital Trust can detect potential copyright infringements at an early stage, allowing website owners to take corrective action before receiving legal threats.
  2. Legal Protection: The comprehensive reports generated by AI Digital Trust services serve as a valuable legal defense. In the event of a copyright claim, website owners can demonstrate their proactive efforts to comply with copyright laws.
  3. Peace of Mind: Utilizing AI Digital Trust services provides peace of mind for website owners, knowing that they have taken steps to ensure their online content complies with copyright regulations.

While it’s not mandatory for all websites to have a disclaimer against data scraping, many websites choose to implement such disclaimers to protect their content and data. The decision to include a disclaimer depends on various factors, including the nature of the website, the type of content it hosts, and the website owner’s preferences.

  1. Protecting Intellectual Property: Websites often invest time and resources in creating and curating content. A disclaimer can deter unauthorized parties from scraping and using this content without permission.
  2. Preserving User Privacy: If the website collects user data, a disclaimer can reinforce the commitment to privacy and discourage the unauthorized collection of user information by third parties.
  3. Maintaining Data Integrity: Data scraping can lead to inaccurate or outdated information being disseminated. A disclaimer helps maintain the integrity of the data provided by the website.
  4. Legal Protection: Having a disclaimer can strengthen the legal position of the website owner in case of disputes or legal actions against unauthorized use of the website’s content.
  5. Terms of Use Enforcement: Including scraping restrictions in a disclaimer reinforces the terms of use for the website, making it clear that certain activities are not allowed.

Ultimately, the decision to include a disclaimer depends on the website owner’s assessment of potential risks and their desire to safeguard their content and users. It’s advisable for websites that handle sensitive information or have valuable content to consider implementing a disclaimer, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all requirement.


This website, including all its content and materials, is protected by copyright and intellectual property laws. All rights are reserved unless otherwise stated. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, scanning, scraping, archiving, copying, or storing of data from this website is strictly prohibited.

  • By accessing this website, you agree to the following terms:
  • Limited License: You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, and revocable license to access and use the content on this website for personal, non-commercial purposes only.
  • Prohibited Activities: You may not engage in any of the following activities without explicit written permission:
  • Reproducing, distributing, or publicly displaying any content from this website.
  • Scanning, scraping, archiving, copying, or storing data from this website through any means, automated or otherwise.
  • Modifying or creating derivative works based on the content of this website.
  • Enforcement and Penalties: Violation of these terms may result in legal action and the imposition of hefty fines. We reserve the right to pursue all available legal remedies, including seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, and recovery of attorney’s fees.
  • Monitoring and Protection: We actively monitor and employ measures to protect our content and data. Any attempt to circumvent these measures or breach these terms will be considered a violation and may be subject to legal consequences.
  • No Waiver: Our failure to enforce any provision of these terms does not constitute a waiver of that provision or any other provision of these terms.

By continuing to use this website, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to abide by these terms. We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time, and you must review them periodically for changes. If you do not agree to these terms, please refrain from using this website.

This disclaimer is effective immediately and applies to all users and visitors of this website.

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material under certain circumstances without obtaining permission from or paying royalties to the copyright holder. It is a crucial aspect of copyright law that balances the rights of copyright owners with the public’s interest in the free exchange of ideas, information, and creativity.

The United States Copyright Act outlines four factors that are considered when determining whether a particular use of copyrighted material qualifies as fair use. These factors are:

  1. Purpose and Character of the Use: Courts assess whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds something new or creates a new purpose. Nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are more likely to be considered fair use.
  2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work is considered, with creative and imaginative works being more strongly protected than factual or informational works.
  3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: The extent of the use about the whole work is evaluated. Using a small portion of the work may be more likely to be considered fair use than using a large portion.
  4. Effect on the Market: Courts examine the potential impact of the use on the market value of the copyrighted work. If the use negatively affects the market for the original work, it is less likely to be considered fair use.

It’s important to note that fair use is a nuanced and context-dependent concept. There are no strict rules, and each case is evaluated on its individual merits. Additionally, fair use is primarily a U.S. legal doctrine, and other countries may have different approaches or exceptions to copyright law.

The use of thumbnails can potentially be considered fair use under copyright law, depending on the specific circumstances. Thumbnails are small, reduced-size versions of larger images, often used for preview purposes, and their legality can be influenced by factors such as purpose, nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and effect on the market.

  1. Purpose and Character of the Use: If the use of the thumbnail serves a transformative purpose, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, or educational purposes, it is more likely to be considered fair use.
  2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the original work is considered. If the work is more factual or informational, it may be more likely to be considered fair use.
  3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: The use of a thumbnail, being a small and often cropped version of the original work, may be considered less substantial. However, this factor is evaluated in conjunction with the purpose of use.
  4. Effect on the Market: If the use of the thumbnail does not negatively impact the market for the original work, it is more likely to be considered fair use.

It’s important to note that there is no one-size-fits-all answer, and each case is evaluated based on its unique circumstances. Courts consider the specific facts of each situation when determining whether the use of thumbnails qualifies as fair use or if it infringes on the copyright holder’s rights. Additionally, laws and interpretations may vary in different jurisdictions. If in doubt, seeking legal advice is recommended.

Backlinking to an image itself is generally not considered copyright infringement. A backlink is a reference or hyperlink to the location of an image hosted on another website. It does not involve copying or reproducing the image on the linking website; instead, it directs users to the original source.

  1. Permission and Licensing: Even though backlinking itself may not be a copyright infringement, it doesn’t absolve the linker from respecting the original creator’s rights. If the image is copyrighted, it’s crucial to ensure that the use of the image on the linked site is done with the proper permissions or falls under a legal exception, such as fair use.
  2. Hotlinking: Hotlinking, also known as inline linking, occurs when a website directly embeds an image hosted on another site instead of hosting a copy of the image on its own server. While this doesn’t involve copying the image, it may raise issues related to bandwidth usage and server load for the original image host. Some website owners might consider hotlinking without permission to be a form of content theft.

Always check the terms of use, licensing agreements, or copyright policies of the website hosting the image. If in doubt about the legality of using a particular image, it’s advisable to seek permission from the copyright owner or use images that are explicitly labeled for reuse under a Creative Commons license or similar terms.

The liability of multi-user platforms for copyright infringement often depends on the legal framework in the jurisdiction where the platform operates. In many cases, the liability is influenced by the platform’s role in hosting and moderating user-generated content. The legal landscape varies, but here are some general considerations.

In the United States, the DMCA provides a safe harbor for online service providers, protecting them from direct liability for copyright infringement by their users. To qualify for this safe harbor, platforms must comply with certain conditions, including:

  • Designating a registered agent for receiving DMCA takedown notices.
  • Implementing a policy to terminate the accounts of repeat infringers.
  • Responding promptly to valid DMCA takedown notices by removing or disabling access to the infringing content.

This safe harbor provision shields platforms from direct liability, provided they act in accordance with the DMCA requirements.

The EU Copyright Directive, which came into effect in 2019, includes Article 17 (formerly Article 13), placing certain responsibilities on online content-sharing service providers. Platforms falling under this category are required to obtain authorization from copyright holders for the content users upload. They must also take measures to ensure the unavailability of unauthorized copyrighted material.

This directive shifts some responsibility to the platform to actively prevent copyright infringement, and platforms are required to negotiate licensing agreements with rightsholders.

Different countries may have different approaches to the liability of multi-user platforms for copyright infringement. Some jurisdictions may have legislation or legal doctrines similar to the DMCA, while others may have distinct rules or interpretations.

Regardless of legal requirements, many multi-user platforms have their own policies and terms of service regarding copyright infringement. These policies often outline the platform’s stance on copyright issues, the process for reporting infringement, and potential consequences for users who violate copyright rules.

In summary, the liability of multi-user platforms for copyright infringement is influenced by the legal framework in the jurisdiction and the platform’s compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Platform policies and terms of service also play a significant role in shaping the platform’s approach to copyright matters.

In the United States, the legal framework that addresses the liability of websites for content uploaded by individual users primarily revolves around Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). This section provides a degree of immunity to online platforms for content posted by their users.

  • Text of Section 230(c)(1):“No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

This means that online platforms, such as social media websites, forums, or any service that hosts user-generated content, are generally not held liable for the content posted by their users. This immunity allows these platforms to thrive without the constant fear of legal repercussions for user-generated content.

  • Zeran v. America Online, Inc. (1997): This case established early on that online platforms are not held liable for the actions of their users. The court held that Section 230 shields platforms from liability for content created by third-party users.
  •, LLC v. Fair Housing Council of Southern California (2008): This case clarified that while Section 230 provides broad immunity, platforms can lose that immunity if they are actively involved in creating or developing content that is considered illegal.

In this case, the court reiterated that Section 230 immunity applies even if a platform is alleged to have failed to act upon content that violates the law. The court held that Section 230 protects online platforms from being treated as the publisher or speaker of content provided by others.

It’s essential to note that while Section 230 provides substantial immunity, it does not shield websites from liability for certain types of content, such as intellectual property violations or federal criminal law. Also, laws and interpretations may vary in different jurisdictions.

It’s always advisable to consult with legal professionals for specific advice tailored to your situation and jurisdiction, as laws can evolve, and new cases may shape the legal landscape.

  1. An operator of a content-sharing platform, on which users can illegally make protected content available to the public, does not make a “communication to the public” of that content, “unless it contributes, beyond merely making that platform available, to giving access to such content to the public in breach of copyright.”
  2. Operators may benefit from the exemption from liability under the E-commerce Directive,[iii] unless they play an active role that gives them knowledge of, or control over, the content uploaded to their platform.
  3. As regards the circumstances in which these platform operators do in fact go beyond merely making the platform available to users, the CJEU clarified that this would include where: The operator has specific knowledge that protected content is available illegally on its platform and refrains from expeditiously deleting it or blocking access to it.
  4. The operator refrains from putting in place appropriate technological measures that would be expected from a reasonably diligent operator, despite the fact that it knows (or ought to know, in a general sense) that users are making protected content available to the public illegally via its platform.
  5. The operator participates in selecting protected content illegally communicated to the public, provides tools specifically intended for the illegal sharing of such content, or knowingly promotes such sharing. This may be demonstrated where that operator has adopted a financial model that encourages users to communicate protected content to the public.



AI Digital Trust recommends if you have a blog or a website that has multiple users do not copy anything from search engine images period and make sure your users are aware of copyright infringement and the law.

Several websites offer free images that are available for commercial and non-commercial use, often under licenses such as Creative Commons.

  1. Unsplash: Unsplash provides a large collection of high-resolution photos submitted by photographers around the world, and they can be used for both commercial and non-commercial projects.
  2. Pixabay: Pixabay offers a vast library of high-quality images, illustrations, and vectors. Most of the content is released under Creative Commons, making them suitable for various purposes.
  3. Pexels: Pexels provides a diverse range of high-quality photos and videos that are free to use for personal and commercial projects. They also offer a user-friendly search and discoverability interface.
  4. Freepik: Freepik offers a wide variety of free vectors, stock photos, and PSD files. While many resources are free, some may require attribution depending on the licensing terms. Some images have a premium license, so do not assume they are free.
  5. Burst by Shopify: Burst is a resource by Shopify that offers free high-resolution photos for commercial use. It’s particularly geared towards entrepreneurs and online businesses.
  6. SplitShire: SplitShire provides a collection of high-quality photos and videos for free use, with no attribution required. It covers various themes and categories.
  7. Reshot: Reshot offers a curated collection of high-quality, non-stocky images that are free to use for commercial and non-commercial projects.
  8. Flickr (Creative Commons): Flickr allows users to search for images that are licensed under Creative Commons. It’s important to check the specific license associated with each image.

Remember to review and adhere to the licensing terms of each image to ensure proper usage and attribution if required. Additionally, always verify the licensing terms on the respective websites, as they may change over time.

Alternately get AI to create the images for you. Remember whenever you are searching for images try not to use search engine images because even if the image may not have watermarks it could have been copied from the license holder. Just because the image has had a license from a third party it does not make you exempt from purchasing another. Always do your due diligence!

  • – Picright is a company that specializes in copyright enforcement and claims resolution. They offer a comprehensive copyright infringement protection service that includes a bot-powered search to scan online channels for copyright violations 24/7. They also provide DMCA takedown service to track and enforce copyright infringement on websites, social media, and marketplaces.
  • www.redpoints.comRed Points offers a comprehensive copyright infringement protection service that includes a bot-powered search to scan online channels for copyright violations 24/7. They also provide a DMCA takedown service to track and enforce copyright infringement on websites, social media, and marketplaces 
  • www.copyscape.comCopyscape is a plagiarism detection service that can be used to scan websites for copyright infringement. It offers a free plagiarism checker tool that can be used to check the originality of content on a website. It also offers a premium service that can be used to scan entire websites for duplicate content.
  • Plagiarism Checker is another plagiarism detection service that can be used to scan websites for copyright infringement. It offers a free plagiarism checker tool that can be used to check the originality of content on a website. It also offers a premium service that can be used to scan entire websites for duplicate content.
  • www.ithenticate.comiThenticate is a plagiarism detection service that can be used to scan websites for copyright infringement. It offers a free plagiarism checker tool that can be used to check the originality of content on a website. It also offers a premium service that can be used to scan entire websites for duplicate content.
  • www.scribbr.comScribbr plagiarism checker is powered by Turnitin, a leader in plagiarism prevention. It can detect plagiarism and other writing issues with high accuracy. You can upload your document to the website, and your writing stays private. The tool provides access to over 99 billion web pages and 89 million publications. Scribbr’s plagiarism checker is free to use, and you can check your document for plagiarism and other writing issues.
  • www.duplichecker.comDuplichecker is another popular plagiarism checker that allows you to scan up to 25,000 words per search. It uses global search methods and AI-based technology to deeply analyze the content for duplication. This plagiarism checker is one of the most efficient and advanced due to its extensive features such as URL checking, custom PDF reports, and supporting multiple file formats. Duplichecker is free to use, and you can check your document for plagiarism and other writing issues.
  • – Commonly known as the Wayback Machine, offers a unique and valuable service by storing copies of websites on its servers, creating a digital archive of the internet’s evolution. This web archiving initiative allows users to revisit historical versions of websites, tracking changes and developments over time. By capturing snapshots of web pages at various intervals, the Wayback Machine plays a crucial role in preserving the digital heritage of the internet. Users can explore the archived versions of a website, offering a glimpse into its past designs, content, and functionalities. This service not only serves as a digital time capsule but also proves invaluable for researchers, historians, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamic nature of online content and the evolution of the web. (We can put a wager that your website has been scanned without your permission and a snapshot is stored in their servers).

There has been a concerning surge in cybercriminal activity targeting law firms through the dissemination of deceptive emails. Cyber attackers are resorting to sophisticated tactics, impersonating legitimate law firms by crafting convincing spoof emails that appear to contain cease and desist letters. These malicious emails often exploit the trust associated with legal correspondence, tricking recipients into opening attachments purportedly containing legal documents. However, these attachments conceal a more insidious threat – viruses or malware designed to compromise the security of the targeted law firm’s systems. This alarming trend underscores the need for heightened cybersecurity measures within the legal sector to thwart such malicious attempts and safeguard sensitive client information. Law firms must remain vigilant and employ robust cybersecurity protocols to protect both their digital assets and the confidentiality of the clients they serve.–email-spoof-impersonation-notice

**Do not respond to the recipient that sent the email, block them, and do not open attachments.

  • End-To-End Compliance
  • Market Research
  • Image Scanning
  • Advanced Image Recognition
  • Intelligent Image Analysis
  • Easy Image Replacements
  • Reverse Image Search
  • Custom Monitoring & Reporting

If you need legal advice because you have received an email or letter, or you want to enforce copyright infringement contact they are located in the UK.

#aidigitaltrust #copyrightinfringement #intellectualpropertyrights #trademarks #copyrighttrolls #scraping #scanning #screenshots #snapshots #archiving #storingdata #breachoftermsofuse #fairuse #thumbnails #backlinking #sharingcontent #plagiarism